Brought to you by...EarthWeb...earthweb.com
intranetjournal.com
Intranet Journal
Planning
Development
Design
Deployment
Management
Extranets
Interviews
Discussions
Resources
Library

-----

EarthWeb Sites:

developer.com
developerdirect.com
htmlgoodies.com
javagoodies.com
jars.com
intranetjournal.com
javascripts.com
datamation.com
gamelan.com
itknowledge.com
roadcoders.com

-


From Intranet to Extranet
Copyright ©1997 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any use is subject to the rules stated in the Terms and Conditions of Use.

By Richard H. Baker


Excerpt (chapter 1) from "Extranets: The Complete Sourcebook," by Richard H. Baker. Published by McGraw Hill's Beta Books. Reprinted with permission.

An extranet has a lot in common with an intranet. Although intranets have been defined as existing behind firewalls and serving purely internal purposes, that has never really been the case. From the beginning, when intranet builders began to apply World Wide Web technology to specific organizational communication needs, their applications have always included both internal and external communication.

Take note: that's communication, with no s. We're not talking about the technical concept of communications here, but the singular form of communication that takes place between real people. And just as communication is important between members of an organization, it is just as important between organizations. Successful businesses no longer exist as isolated enterprises. They have come to see the value of active communication with their supplies on one hand and their customers on the other. These customers and suppliers, in turn, are linked to other customers and suppliers. The result is an interlocked chain that is something like a box of fishhooks, interlinked in multiple unpredictable ways. Anything you do to one fishhook affects countless others.

That's why intranets have never been confined to strictly internal communication needs. That's also why an extranet cannot be completely confined to external communication. The line between internal and external communication was never strictly observed, and it is starting to disappear entirely. As businesses form partnerships with their suppliers and customers, there remains only the finest of distinctions between the inside and the outside. An extranet simply grants formal recognition to that long-established fact. Most intranet owners either allow external access already, or plan to soon. (Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2).

Figure 1.1. Most Intranet owners either allow external access, or plan to (Forrester Research).

Figure 1.2. Customers and other business partners are the main external users.

The reverse is also true. Though an extranet extends itself to outside communication, it should not be limited strictly to that. The test of a true extranet is that it is equally capable of handling internal and external information.

Figure 1.3. The differences are in the details.

How the Extranet Has Evolved

It all goes back to the Internet, a phenomenon that has transformed the computer industry, and the way people use computers, in many ways. As the Internet and the World Wide Web became established, organizations have learned to use Web technology to distribute information to their employees. By establishing intranets, these organizations have been able to distribute information to their employees much more cost-effectively than older means like newsletters and memos.

That's why the earliest uses of intranets were to distribute corporate information: newsletters, policies, employee handbooks, and internal telephone directories. According to a report published on the Netscape Web page, General Electric is no longer printing a standard directory of company information. By putting the directory on an intranet, the company is saving $240,000 a year in printing costs. Figure 1.4 shows that in 1996, planners were looking at familiar applications like these, though several, like product planning and e-mail, had external uses as well.

Figure 1.4. Early in the intranet game, corporate planners concentrated mainly on familiar internal applications. Nevertheless, many of these had external implications.

Results like that can provide a quick payback for the costs of implementation, particularly when the implementation costs themselves are low. Eli Lilly linked about 3,000 employees for a total cost of only $80,000.

The intranet as groupware

Though the intranet is still a technological toddler, applications like these already qualify for legacy status. In one of the shortest reproductive cycles on record, the intranet has spawned second and third generation applications that extend both ways from the original corporate base. One branch of the family extends downward from corporate-wide communication to allow exchange of information at departmental and workgroup levels.

Some developers asked this sensible question: If the Web provides an easy, facile way to communicate general company information, why not extend it to other types of information and applications? One of the first examples of this mode of thinking was to link an intranet to information stored in conventional databases. It was only one more logical step to extend their thinking to information sharing within departments and workgroups. One evolutionary path of the intranet, then, has been in the direction of groupware.

Publishing company-wide information remains a good way to get started with an extranet, but don't plan on stopping there. No doubt you have much information that is unique to departments and workgroups: information on different projects pursued by different teams. It's been predicted that the benefits of sharing this kind of information can be much greater than the savings you can get from intranetting internal communication alone.

Looking outward

The same can easily be true when you look outward instead of downward. You and your business partners also have information to share. Product information, price lists, and delivery schedules are only part of the picture. This need has already been recognized in areas like electronic document interchange (EDI), which allows business partners to place orders, deliver goods, and process payments electronically. The Federal Express do-it-yourself shipment tracking system (Figure 1.5).represents yet another level of sophistication. Customers track their own shipments without requiring intervention by someone else. In addition, Fedex need not pay the cost of having someone there to intervene.

Figure 1.5. The Fedex do-it-yourself shipment tracking system is only one feature of this pioneering extranet.

There is much to be gained by sharing information both internally and externally. The extranet gets rid of that distinction and lets you concentrate on sharing information whenever and wherever good communication is important. And good communication is important just about everywhere.

New Tools for Better Sharing

That was the first generation of Intranet evolution, extending its outlook downward toward departments and workgroups. The departmental intranet still did little, at least deliberately, to look beyond the firewall toward essential business partners outside the organization.

The downward-looking generation did produce some things of value. First, it established the point that intranet technology need not be limited to obvious, enterprise-level applications. Second, it brought valuable new tools into common use. These tools vastly enhance the process of sharing information with fellow team members, both inside and outside the organization.

Not designed for sharing Consider the typical corporate computer today. It contains a suite of desktop applications including, most likely, a word processor and a spreadsheet. It is networked to a file server, often more than one. It is also likely to be served by electronic mail.

None of these tools is truly designed to share information. The word processor, spreadsheet, and other applications that make up a desktop suite are designed for use by individuals working alone. The suites have gained some communication functions in recent years, but these have been grafted onto what are still essentially single-use applications.

The file server? It's a great place to store files, but a horrible place to find them. Furthermore, it has no inherent facilities for sharing work and resources. File servers let you share disk space but little else. It is a static sort of storage, with little to foster group dynamics.

E-mail is closer to becoming a workgroup product - in fact, the newest versions of e-mail are evolving into sophisticated work-sharing applications. Nevertheless, simply trading e-mail messages is not enough by itself to foster group dynamics. E-mail is also plagued by problems of compatibility between systems, challenges of directory management, and other uncured ailments. Not the least of the problems is the prevalence of junk e-mail that diverts attention from more important forms of communication.

There are, of course, dedicated workgroup tools like Notes and Exchange, and they cannot easily be written out of the picture. Nevertheless, the advent of Web technology for internal communication heralds the use of the same technology for communication throughout a much-extended workgroup. In particular, Notes is being revamped to work with the Web rather than as a self-contained system.

Better things from the Web First-generation intranet developers have demonstrated how you can use Web technology, and Web page development methods, to improve group communication, both inside and outside the organization. Web techniques have made it easier to find your way through the massive amounts of information on the Internet. Surely they can help people find their way through the less massive amounts of information you want to exchange with employees and external trading partners.

In its more visionary statements, Netscape envisions a model in which virtually all corporate information is stored on a Web server. Creating a Web page is much like creating a word processing document, and it certainly is no more difficult. Nearly anyone can learn how to do it.

But - and here's a key element - not just anyone can read or edit your information. A Web administrator can use modern access control features to determine who can read, and who can edit, a Web document.

The advantage to this approach is that anyone with information to share can readily share it, with someone in the next cubicle or someone in the next country. Furthermore, the information can be made easier to find and use.

Benefits of this approach include the ability to:

Share information with less effort. A document can be posted on a Web server and updated instantly when necessary. You need not send e-mail to a list of intended recipients. The recipients can come to the message. Find information with less effort. Search tools are now readily available that can help find information no matter where it is posted. Unlike older forms of data storage, you need not even know that the resource exists. The search tools can find it anyway. Reduce printing and mailing costs. Electronic documents may not save as much paper and postage as the optimists like to think, but savings still are possible.

Of course, there are potential drawbacks as well. Security and access control are vital if you are to open information to parties outside the organization. But these are also important in a strictly internal intranet, so the challenges are not that much greater.

Applications emphasize the workgroup As intranet developers concentrated their attentions on the department and the workgroup, they created several new types of applications. Though originally intended for internal workgroups, these applications also have external potential:

Sharing information with cross-functional teams. It has become a common business situation for project teams to be formed from members of different departments. Team members can be at different locations, and may operate different kinds of computers. A team web page on an intranet or extranet can be an ideal way to share information.

Extranet potential: Project teams that extend beyond single organizations to customer and vendor locations. In these different firms, the differences in equipment and location will be even greater. An extranet can help these cross-corporate teams share schedules, product information, development plans, reference material, and to-do lists.

Sharing information throughout departments. This kind of sharing can be critical. People need to know what others in their departments are doing and how they can best get the job done. They can share resources like document templates, standard procedures, best practices, status reports, and technical support.

Extranet potential: Technical support is an obvious and fruitful way to share information with business partners via an extranet. And when working together to produce a better quality product, multi-corporate workgroups can benefit from shared information just as well as internal workgroups.

Sharing information between organizational levels. Good communication with sales representatives and other mobile workers is a major challenge. These dispersed workers often lack regular contact with the home office. Yet it is they who must often answer customers' questions and shoot the customers' troubles. For them, an extranet is a way to get accurate, timely information. The same link can work the other way, too: customer contact employees get some of the first and best feedback from the field. The extranet can help them relay this valuable information to the decision-makers back at headquarters.

Extranet potential: This kind of application already extends well beyond the firewalls at headquarters. It would be only one more small step to give customers direct access to important information, and to let them send their feedback directly to the executive suite.

Why Internal Communication Isn't Enough

The expansion of the intranet for internal communication has been spectacular. It's been so much so, in fact, that intranet development will soon overtake and far surpass public Internet applications. Nevertheless, David Moschella, senior vice president for research at Computerworld, recently wrote that that, "Despite this apparent stampede, the industry's emphasis on intranets can be described only as disappointing."

"Since the beginning of enterprise computing, information technology suppliers have sold their wares based on promises of internal productivity, Moschella explained. "Accounting, human resources, payroll, manufacturing, and word processing systems were designed to improve internal company efficiency. They have often succeeded."

But, he continued, "the relationship between internal efficiency and business productivity has never been a one-to-one correlation, and it's ultimately subject to diminishing returns. Unless information technology can be used to directly provide customers with superior products and services, its potential long-term potential will remain elusive."

Moschella cites EDI, digital cash, online banking, and of course the Fedex shipment tracking system as examples of technology applications that can transform major business activities. He acknowledges that many of these applications need time to mature and that many purely intranet applications are valuable. Nevertheless, he believes it is wrong to focus strictly on conventional intranet applications. "Every dollar invested in internal automation is a dollar that could have gone to a more compelling and useful (external) presence," he said. These external applications could include "a useful presence on the World Wide Web, a supply-chain EDI application, or an online customer service capability. The sooner the industry makes these external, customer-centric applications its top priority, the sooner the great potential of the Internet will be realized."

More of the same to come Expect more of this kind of commentary in the future. The same issue of Computerworld that carried Moschella's column also described how Countrywide Home Loans (Pasadena, CA) built a hybrid extranet - half Internet, half intranet - that could serve as a prototype for the kind. In fact, Countrywide was one of the first organizations to describe its installation as an extranet.

Through this application, Countrywide can share information with the banks and mortgage brokers who are its business partners. At the same time, strictly internal information like financial databases are screened from outside disclosure.

Called Platinum Lender Access, the system lets a banker who is processing a mortgage application call up the Platinum site to check such information as the loan's status, the account history, and current interest rates.

A bank of firewalls restricts access to banks that can supply the proper name, password, ID number and other proprietary information. An access control system is designed to reveal only information to which the specific bank is entitled.

Countrywide reports substantial savings, just in a limited initial trial, over traditional methods that involved telephone messages, faxes, and mailed documents.

Controlling access The biggest risk, of course, is that someone will use the system to obtain information they shouldn't have. Countrywide not only worries about competitors and hackers, but it fears individual home buyers might gain access to data that is intended for the banks and brokers alone. Business partners share those concerns.

To meet the security need, the firm has established several layers of access control, the full details of which it keeps to itself. One element is the Secure Sockets Layer encryption scheme used in Netscape products. There are also several firewalls in place, including some custom-built installations.

How Internal Applications can Become External

The range of possible extranet applications is almost infinite. In particular, nearly anything you can devise for an intranet can have external implications. Nevertheless, the early applications have generally fit into one of these categories:

One-to-many communication between teams, departments or entire corporations. You can post information on a Web page, reducing paper documents and making the information available almost immediately. The cost savings in printing can be significant, but even more important is the savings that come from better communication. Applications that require two-way interaction. If there is such as thing as a classic extranet application, it is technical help and support. Many computer-oriented companies have found it easy and cost-saving to post specifications and problem-solving information on the Web, and to use Web e-mail as a vehicle for receiving and answering inquiries. In other instances, an employee needs information to prepare a report, analyze data, or learn about suppliers and customers. Here, a Web site linked to corporate database resources can be easier and quicker than relying on printed reports. Collaboration that requires many-to-many interactions. In this category are newsgroups whose members exchange information. Their posted messages can form a valuable knowledge base for others. At times, of course, you will want exchanges of confidential information to remain within a controlled group. Even in this case, though, it is not always necessary to confine that group to internal members. Trusted suppliers and customers can, and often should, be in the communication chain.

Types of applications Within these general classifications, application development to date has focused on several particular types:

  • Sales and marketing

  • Product development

  • Customer service

  • Human resources

  • Financial

    Sales and marketing The departments that sell products face a continuing challenge delivering up-to-date reference information to customers who often are dispersed over a large area: the nation, or even the world.

    Sales representatives know that having the right information available at a critical moment can be the difference between winning and losing a sale. An extranet can give them information like this:

  • Product specifications and prices

  • Sales leads

  • Competitive information gleaned from the competitors'

  • Web sites

  • Calendars of sales activities

  • Just-in-time training

  • Instant sales presentations

    Marketing people, meanwhile, need access to database-type information on current and potential customers. For example, Home Box Office (Figure 1.6) has converted its marketing campaign materials from printed and videocasette forms to a Web site that gives the sales force instant access from just about anywhere.

    Figure 1.6. HBO offers a host of features for its home page viewers, but it also has internal/external features that support its sales representatives.

    Cadence Design Systems built a dynamic Web database of sales and marketing information. This system maps out each step of the sales cycle with links to sales support resources. It also:

  • Uses web-page forms for communication with headquarters.

  • Lets global account teams share information in a secure environment.

  • Provides a storehouse of sales and reference materials

  • Offers links to key Internet sites

  • Provides a daily news report on industry developments (Figure 1.7).

  • HomeAbout UsSearchSubscribeContact UsFAQs
    Use of this site is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.
    Copyright (c) 1996-1998 EarthWeb, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of EarthWeb is prohibited.