#title My Anarchy
#subtitle Ultimate Anarchy
#author Golden Dragon
#SORTauthors DD
#SORTtopics An Anarchist FAQ 
#source Mine
#date 2/28/2013
#lang en
#DELETED bloggish post

Of course as an anarchist I feel the need to enter another definition which is mine and I do not see in FAQ.

Most of the Anarchic definitions I see, imply an attempt to create a system that would be a perfect fit for Anarchy. Every attempt to create Anarchy implies the definition of a set of rules, behaviors and a structure that defies its meaning.

I see Anarchy as the highest form of human interaction, not bound to a particular social structure.

I strongly believe that Anarchy “emerges”, it is not imposed, nor designed, nor engineered nor created. It is a natural simple higher stage of social evolution coming into existence when humans are ready. Its amazing power of seduction rests in the people not in any social structure.

You have Anarchy when humans are spontaneously giving, understanding and embracing their self-limitation in respect of others, not dealing with a set of rules for which they are forced to be that. Humans that are able to achieve that state do not need a police force, nor an army, nor judges nor even a state: Anarchists should not be against... a police force, an army, judges even a state become simply meaningless, there is no need/use for them.

We have to work on making ourselves  better humans if we want Anarchy, any system we create is only as good as the humans that are part of it...